† Corresponding author. E-mail:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51672180, 51622306, and 21673151), Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science & Technology, the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), the 111 Project, Joint International Research Laboratory of Carbon-Based Functional Materials and Devices.
Small-molecule organic semiconductor crystals (SMOSCs) combine broadband light absorption (ultraviolet–visible–near infrared) with long exciton diffusion length and high charge carrier mobility. Therefore, they are promising candidates for realizing high-performance photodetectors. Here, after a brief resume of photodetector performance parameters and operation mechanisms, we review the recent advancements in application of SMOSCs as photodetectors, including photoconductors, phototransistors, and photodiodes. More importantly, the SMOSC-based photodetectors are further categorized according to their detection regions that cover a wide range from ultraviolet to near infrared. Finally, challenges and outlooks of SMOSC-based photodetectors are provided.
Small-molecule organic semiconductor crystals (SMOSCs) have become one of the research hotspots in recent years due to their unique optical and electrical properties. Compared with organic thin films, SMOSCs possess fewer grain boundaries, fewer undesirable defects, and long-range-order molecular packing. Thus, they have many distinct advantages, including longer exciton diffusion lengths and higher charge carrier mobilities, which can largely suppress the recombination of excitons and accelerate charge transport.[1] Up to now, SMOSCs have been widely used for realizing high-performance organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), organic field-effect transistors (OFETs), organic photovoltaics (OPVs), and organic photodetectors.[2–6]
Spectral response of SMOSCs can also be readily tuned from ultraviolet (UV) to the near infrared (NIR) region by controlling the molecular structure.[5,6] This has enabled the successful development of high-performance and panchromatic photodetectors that are targeted for image sensing and scanners.[7] Moreover, SMOSCs have excellent compatibility with solution-processed methods and flexible substrates, making them possible to realize innovative applications such as implantable optical communication, electronic eye, portable analyzer, and so on.[6–8] Over the past decades, rapid developments in photodetectors based on SMOSCs have been achieved. For example, Schwab et al.[9] gave the first demonstration of single-crystalline porphine nanorod-based photodetectors in 2004. Encouraged by their interesting discovery, highly sensitive, low-cost, and flexible photodetectors have been widely investigated by using SMOSCs as light harvesting materials. In addition, benefiting from the development of aligned/patterned strategies, integrated SMOSC-based photodetectors for image sensing applications have been successfully demonstrated.[10] However, no study has yet presented a comprehensive overview of the development and progress for SMOSC-based photodetectors.
Herein, after reviewing the fundamentals and key figure-of-merit parameters of photodetectors in Section
Photodetectors are typical optoelectronic devices that can detect light signals via the photoelectric effect.[11] In this section, the key figures of merit used to characterize photodetectors and most widely adopted device architectures of SMOSC-based photodetectors are summarized.
External quantum efficiency (EQE): EQE is the ratio of the number of photo-generated carriers to the number of incident photon. It can be expressed as
Responsivity (R): R is defined as the ratio of photocurrent to incident-light intensity, which is usually expressed as
Detectivity (D): it is used to describe the ability of weak light detection, the normalized value is called the specific detectivity (D*), which can be written as
Response speed (t): it determines the ability of a photodetector to follow a rapid modulated light signal, which is characterized by the rise time (tr) and fall time (tf). The rise time tr or the fall time tf is defined as the time required for the response to rise from 10% to 90% or to decay from 90% to 10% of the peak value.
According to the working mechanisms, SMOSC-based photodetectors can be categorized as photoconductors, phototransistors, and photodiodes. Photoconductors are typical two-terminal devices (Fig.
Photoconductor is the simplest type of the three device structures. The photoactive region can generate excitons upon light illumination, which can then dissociate into free charge carriers under an external bias voltage.[6] In the past two decades, studies on the photoconductivity of SMOSCs have developed rapidly. In this section, we will review photoconductors based on SMOSCs for different spectral response regions, ranging from UV to NIR light.
The preparation of high-quality SMOSCs with appropriate optical bandgap is of significant importance for the realization of high-performance visible photodetectors. Solution-based self-assembly has been frequently adopted for the fabrication of organic single-crystalline nanowires, nanorods, or nanoribbons.[13] Early in 2004, Schwab and coworkers[9] used a simple drop-casting method to prepare meso-tetrakis(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphine nanorods. Upon 488 nm light illumination, the device containing approximately 6100 nanorods showed a rapid response speed of less than 100 ms. Although the photoswitching ratio was not high due to the existence of the charge storage mechanism in the device, this work paved the way for using SMOSCs to realize visible photodetectors. In another example, Jiang et al.[14] studied the photoconductive behavior of self-assembled 2-anthracen-9-ylmethylene malononitrile micro-/nanowires (Figs.
Copper phthalocyanine (CuPc) is another typical small-molecule organic material for red light detection. Due to the outstanding thermal and chemical stability, the CuPc molecules can easily form ordered stacks during a physical vapor deposition (PVD) process. A schematic illustration is shown in Fig.
One of the very important advantages of photoconductive devices is that they can be easily integrated for image sensors. Jie et al.[18,19] first demonstrated patterning of CuPc nanowire arrays as image sensors. The patterning of CuPc nanowire arrays was realized by using a metallic nanoparticle-assisted PVD method, as shown in Fig.
The detection of UV light radiation presents a wide range of civil and military applications, such as flame detection, combustion monitoring, and missile warning.[21] SiC, GaN, and diamond as building blocks for UV photodetectors have attracted intense attention.[22–24] Fabrication of these devices requires costly processes, thus SMOSC-based UV photoconductors in this case provide the opportunity for device fabrication simplification.
Zhang et al.[25] demonstrated highly responsive UV photoconductors using ris(8-hydroxyquinoline) aluminum (Alq3) microplates and nanorods. In order to fabricate device, pre-patterned photoresist hollows were constructed by photolithography. With the aid of capillary force and alternating-electric field (Fig.
NIR photodetectors offer promising applications in passive night vision, optical communication, and bio-diagnostics.[27–29] Current inorganic NIR photodetectors are expensive and dependent on costly and complex epitaxial growth on crystalline substrates.[30] Contrastingly, narrow-bandgap SMOSCs offer opportunities for realizing low-cost and flexible NIR photodetectors.
Methyl-squarylium (MeSq) is an ideal organic compound for NIR light harvesting thanks to its good stability and absorption peak in the range of 700–1100 nm. Jie and coworkers reported photoconductors based on 1D MeSq micro-/nanostructures such as nanowires[31] and microwires[32] (Figs.
To date, organic phototransistors (OPTs) have attracted great research interest, because they are able to realize photodetection and signal amplification at the same time. Compared with photoconductive devices, phototransistors can provide significantly higher photoconductive gains with the aid of gate bias. Therefore, they are promising candidates for high-performance photodetectors.[5,6] Here, we will review OPTs based on SMOSCs for different spectral regions, ranging from UV to NIR light.
First example of SMOSC-based visible light phototransistors was demonstrated by Rovira et al. in 2006.[34] Microscale tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) single crystals with a high mobility of 1 cm2·V−1·s−1 were adopted to fabricate OPTs. The OPTs showed a very high photoswitching ratio up to 104 at a gate voltage of 10 V under white light (2.5 W·cm−2). In most cases, solution-phase synthesis is preferable for designing well-ordered molecular structures with face-to-face or slip-stacked π–π arrangement, where the strong π–π interaction facilitates the charge transport. For example, 1D 9,10-bis(phenylethynyl)anthracene (BPEA) nanoribbons,[35] 6-methyl-anthra[2,3-b]benzo[d]thiophene (Me-ABT) microribbons,[36] and N,N'-bis(2-phenylethyl)-perylene-3,4:9,10-tetracarboxylic diimide (BPE-PTCDI) nanowires[37] have been fabricated successfully by simple solution-based self-assembly methods. Typically, the Me-ABT-based OPT had a high R of 1.2 × 104 A·W−1 under white light, which is comparable to commercial single-crystalline silicon thin film transistors (∼ 300 A·W−1).[38] In terms of charge-transfer complexes, they are often found in organic conjugated polymers, while Zhu’s group[39] fabricated two-dimensional (2D) cocrystals successfully. Meso-diphenyltetrathia[22]-annulene[2,1,2,1] (DPTTA) molecules (donors) and C60/C70 molecules (acceptors) were segregated to form linear column networks in long-range order (Fig.
For large-scale device application, the capillary tube induced self-assembly was developed to fabricate ordered organic single-crystalline nanowire arrays. As shown in Figs.
J-aggregated organic semiconductors of 1,3,6,8-tetrakis((4-hexyl phenyl)ethynyl)pyrene(PY-4(THB)) were developed by Choi’s group to detect 400 nm light.[43] In its single-crystalline microribbon, PY-4(THB) had face-on aggregated pyrene cores which were favorable for charge transport. The PY-4(THB) microribbon-based OPTs exhibited a high field-effect mobility of 0.7 cm2·V−1⋅s−1 with a R of 2000 A·W−1 under quite low light intensity of 5.6 μW·cm−2. Microplates of anthracene derivative consisting of phenyl planes and acetylene groups were reported by Kim et al.[44] The microplate-based OPT had a quite high R of 1.1 × 104 A·W−1 and a champion photoswitching ratio of 1.4 × 105 among single-crystalline microplate-based OPTs. In recent years, concerns have focused on pure-UV detectors with visible-blind response. Well-aligned 2,7-dioctyl[1]benzothieno[3,2-b][1]benzothiophene (C8-BTBT) nanoribbon arrays (Fig.
It is noteworthy that the photomemory phenomenon was observed in the C8-BTBT nanoribbon-based phototransistors.[45] The photoswitching behavior of C8-BTBT at zero gate bias is shown in Fig.
Besides conventional OPTs based on 1D and 2D nanostructures, the UV response behavior of single-crystalline nanoparticles has been studied by Nguyen et al.[48] Perylene tetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA) nanoparticles with diameters of ∼ 80 nm (Fig.
The existence of many applications of highly sensitive NIR photodetectors in the field of remote control, fire and airborne early warning, and biomedicine, pushed the development of NIR phototransistors.[27–29] Recently, novel NIR OPTs based on ultrathin SMOSCs have been reported by Wang and coworkers.[49] 2D single-crystalline films based on a furan-thiophene quinoidal compound called TFT-CN were fabricated successfully on water surface (Fig.
Photodiodes rely on a built-in electric field to separate excitons, providing an efficient separation and a fast collection of photogenerated charge carriers.[5] For organic photodiodes based on SMOSCs, the common configurations include all SMOSC-based p–n junctions, Schottky junctions, and organic/inorganic heterojunctions. The three types of devices will be discussed in this section.
A breakthrough of fabricating p–n junctions constructed by all SMOSCs was made by Zhang and coworkers in 2010.[51] Bilayer nanoribbons consisting of p-type CuPc and n-type copper hexadecafluorophthalocyanine (F16CuPc) were successfully fabricated by using a two-step PVD method. The two kinds of SMOSCs are similar in molecular structure and lattice constants, ensuring highly selective crystallization (Figs.
Besides all SMOSC-based p–n junction photodiodes, single-crystalline organic semiconductor/metal Schottky junction photodiodes and organic/inorganic semiconductor p–n junction photodiodes have also been reported so far. Jie’s group[55] reported the in situ self-assembly of 2,4-bis[4-(N, N-dimethylamino)phenyl]squaraine (SQ) nanowire arrays directly on a SiO2/Si substrate with pre-deposited Au/Ti electrodes (Fig.
In summary, SMOSCs with low defect density and few grain boundaries provide an efficient way for charge transport, and a diversity of SMOSCs brings about broadband light absorption from UV to NIR. Therefore, they are promising candidates for high-performance photodetectors. Over the past few decades, different types of SMOSC-based photodetectors, such as photoconductors, phototransistors, and photodiodes, have been successfully achieved, and the device performances have been significantly improved. As summarized in Table
Despite the great progresses of SMOSC-based photodetectors that have been achieved in recent years, there are many challenges left in this field. (i) The response speed needs to be further enhanced to meet the requirements for practical applications. Currently, the response times of most of SMOSC-based photodetectors remain tens or hundreds of milliseconds, which are not enough to capture videos. (ii) The current developed SMOSC-based photodetectors have a very weak sensitivity to infrared light. Although narrow-bandgap conjugated organic semiconductors can be obtained through chemical synthesis, the resulting compounds are unstable in air. Therefore, device encapsulation is necessary to enhance the stability of infrared light detectors. Also, novel hybrid device structures utilizing plasmonic technologies can be employed to improve infrared light detection. (iii) Although the applications of SMOSC-based photodetectors in image sensors have been demonstrated, the image resolution needs to be further improved and the commercialization still remains difficult to realize. This is mainly because the integration of SMOSC-based photodetectors is not compatible with the conventional complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technologies. Therefore, further development of high-performance photodetectors based on SMOSCs is a long-term challenge.
[1] | |
[2] | |
[3] | |
[4] | |
[5] | |
[6] | |
[7] | |
[8] | |
[9] | |
[10] | |
[11] | |
[12] | |
[13] | |
[14] | |
[15] | |
[16] | |
[17] | |
[18] | |
[19] | |
[20] | |
[21] | |
[22] | |
[23] | |
[24] | |
[25] | |
[26] | |
[27] | |
[28] | |
[29] | |
[30] | |
[31] | |
[32] | |
[33] | |
[34] | |
[35] | |
[36] | |
[37] | |
[38] | |
[39] | |
[40] | |
[41] | |
[42] | |
[43] | |
[44] | |
[45] | |
[46] | |
[47] | |
[48] | |
[49] | |
[50] | |
[51] | |
[52] | |
[53] | |
[54] | |
[55] | |
[56] | |
[57] | |
[58] | |
[59] | |
[60] | |
[61] | |
[62] |